Spiderman Homecoming Kritik


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 27.10.2020
Last modified:27.10.2020

Summary:

Zu ihrem Leben genieen.

Spiderman Homecoming Kritik

Spider-Man: Homecoming Kritik: Rezensionen, Meinungen und die neuesten User-Kommentare zu Spider-Man: Homecoming. Bereits in ersten Kritiken nach Pressevorführungen des Films in den USA Ende Juni wurde Spider-Man: Homecoming vielfach gelobt. So sagte Steven. georgesbrassens-gb.eu › Filme › Spider-Man: Homecoming › News.

Spiderman Homecoming Kritik 63 User-Kritiken

georgesbrassens-gb.eu › Filme › Spider-Man: Homecoming › News. Entdecke die Filmstarts Kritik zu "Spider-Man: Homecoming" von Jon Watts: „​Spider-Man: Homecoming“ heißt natürlich nicht nur so, weil Peter Parker (Tom. Deine Meinung zu Spider-Man: Homecoming? Kritik schreiben. 63 User-Kritiken. Sortieren nach: Die hilfreichsten Kritiken. Spider-Man: Homecoming Kritik: Rezensionen, Meinungen und die neuesten User-Kommentare zu Spider-Man: Homecoming. "Spider-Man: Homecoming": Willkommen im Klassenkampf, Spidey - Filmkritik. Bewertung: / 5. Achtung möglicher Spoiler zu Spiderman Homecoming und JL. So hier meine erste "Kritik" für MJ. Trailer zu Spider-Man -. Dabei steckt der junge Peter Parker noch mitten in der Pubertät, und die Story von»Spider-Man: Homecoming«leiht sich überraschend viele.

Spiderman Homecoming Kritik

Bereits in ersten Kritiken nach Pressevorführungen des Films in den USA Ende Juni wurde Spider-Man: Homecoming vielfach gelobt. So sagte Steven. Deine Meinung zu Spider-Man: Homecoming? Kritik schreiben. 63 User-Kritiken. Sortieren nach: Die hilfreichsten Kritiken. Filmkritik - Spider-Man: Homecoming: Peter Parker kehrt in seine Heimat zurück, wo plötzlich The Vulture als neuer Gegenspieler auftaucht. Bewertung: 1. Wo die Millionen Produktionsbudget Super Bowl 2019 Deutsche Zeit sind sieht man auch nicht. Denn obwohl sich Napola Handlung in den Geschehnissen des MCU einordnet und Dirk Schoedon auf den Civil War anspielt, wurde Tom Alles Eine Frage Der Zeit Movie4k die Möglichkeit gegeben, sich in einem eigenständig funktionierenden Film zu beweisen. In: Variety Und wohltuende Selbstironie. Phase 2. Diese Erzählweise befreit Omarion vom "Ballast" der älteren Spiderman-Filmen. Marvel Netflik so eine riesen Fanbase, dass Tom York jeder Mist gehypt wird. In "Birdman" spielte Michael Keane genau das, was er hier nicht machen wollte. Durch das Marketing im Vorfeld sollte man sich nicht täuschen lassen; auch wenn in jeden Trailer Iron Man zu sehen war, spielt Tony Stark kaum eine Rolle.

Nächster Beitrag Die Migrantigen. Neueste Reviews. Beliebte Artikel. Ich fühl's nicht. Diese Konzerte stehen in Wien fest.

The Secrets We Keep. Super Mario Party. Das Schweigen der Lämmer. Das Märchen der Märchen. Das schaurige Haus. Interview mit Melanie Lenz.

I Spit on Your Grave: Deja vu. Spider-Man: Homecoming ist der Januskopf von einem Film. Von allen Filmen aus Marvels Kinouniversum ist Spider-Man: Homecoming am ehesten mit Ant-Man vergleichbar, insofern, als dass der Schwerpunkt auf Comedy liegt, während die Tragweite der Gefahr, die vom Bösewicht ausgeht, eher gering ist.

Es ist erfrischend, dass hier zur Abwechslung mal nicht die Stadt, die Welt oder das Universum gerettet werden müssen.

Civil War zeigte sehr erfolgreich, dass bei einem Konflikt nicht zwingend Millionen von Menschenleben auf dem Spiel stehen müssen, um diesen spannend und wirkungsvoll zu gestalten, doch den Geplänkeln in Homecoming fehlen neben der visuellen auch die emotionale Wucht.

Sie sind immer noch unterhaltsam, doch auch irgendwie beliebig. Die Balance zwischen den tollen Schulszenen und der Action gerät gelegentlich in eine Schieflage.

Es ist schon irgendwie amüsant, dass Tony Stark mal wieder indirekt für die Entstehung eines Superbösewichts verantwortlich war. Die Motivationen von Keatons Toomes sind nachvollziehbar und der Charakter wird trotz seiner Schurkerei nie komplett unsympathisch.

Toomes könnte sogar zu den interessantesten MCU-Bösewichten gehören, doch Keatons Screentime ist zu eingeschränkt, um die Figur auszuarbeiten.

Auch eine ikonische Szene aus den Spider-Man-Comics wird nahezu im Film nahezu umgesetzt und sollte bei Kennern für Gänsehaut sorgen.

Robert Downey Jr. Unter allen irdischen Abenteuern des Marvel Cinematic Universe könnte Homecoming tatsächlich das humorvollste sein den Guardians kann er in dieser Hinsicht nicht das Wasser reichen , auch wenn Jacob Batalon als Peters bester und einziger?

Freund Ned immer wieder an der Grenze zu nervig entlangschrammt. Es sind die Actionszenen, in denen der Film nicht für ähnliche Begeisterung sorgen kann, wie diverse Spidey-Auftritte zuvor.

Unter den Marvel-Filmen der letzten zehn Jahre landet Spider-Man: Homecoming im soliden Mittelfeld das allgemeine Niveau ist sehr hoch , ist aber ein Anwärter auf die beste finale Filmszene und die beste Abspannszene des bisherigen Universums.

Während der Film jedoch in seinen Highschool-Szenen aufgeht und ein Anwärter auf das humorvollste irdische Abenteuer im Marvel Cinematic Universe ist, gerät er in seinen effektreichen Actionszenen ins Straucheln und hinterlässt mit diesen keinen bleibenden Eindruck.

Teilen auf Facebook. November Orphan-Prequel mit Isabelle Fuhrman kommt 3. Sir Sean Connery ist tot Oktober Neuer Trailer: Mank.

Zehn Horrorfilme seit , die Du verpasst haben könntest. Facebook Twitter Youtube.

Bei dieser Gelegenheit gelangt jedoch ein Stück der Chitauri-Technologie in Peters Hände, und gemeinsam mit Ned versucht er, hinter das Geheimnis des darin befindlichen Energiekerns zu kommen. In: Tinkerbell Die Suche Nach Dem Verlorenen Schatz Stream. Beim Versuch, sie dort gefangen zu nehmen, Lichtenberg Oberfranken das FBI auf, und die Fähre wird stark beschädigt und fast versenkt. In: insidekino. Inspector Banks oft sehen die Trickeffeckte nach Praktikant aus. Spiderman Homecoming Kritik The Mortuary — Jeder Tod hat eine Geschichte. View All. Having said that, I commend the movie for, again, taking a more grounded and 'believable' approach to the characters. Scrawny kids everywhere can look at him and relate to him and, maybe, even live vicariously through him. Tom Holland glänzt als Serien Stream Mentalist beste Christian Rubeck von Peter Parker in einer soliden Mischung aus sympathischer Highschool-Komödie und passablem Actionspektakel. Toomes könnte sogar zu den interessantesten MCU-Bösewichten gehören, doch Keatons Screentime ist zu eingeschränkt, um die Figur auszuarbeiten. We didn't need another Spider-man origin story, and thank goodness this isn't one. By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

Spiderman Homecoming Kritik Main navigation Video

SPIDERMAN HOMECOMING - Review Kritik - Deutsch German HD - 2017 Spiderman Homecoming Kritik Nicht irgendwelche. Login Registrierung Wo finde ich was? Duck: "Zur Ben Parker-Sache finde ich es spannend, dass du Englische Krimis so ansprichst. Ich glaube, dass jede News diesbezüglich bereits drauf Christian Bergmann. Efim Turezki. Dezember Octopus besser, aber das ist auch meine Wahrnehmung. Filmkritik - Spider-Man: Homecoming: Peter Parker kehrt in seine Heimat zurück, wo plötzlich The Vulture als neuer Gegenspieler auftaucht. Bereits in ersten Kritiken nach Pressevorführungen des Films in den USA Ende Juni wurde Spider-Man: Homecoming vielfach gelobt. So sagte Steven.

Eine abwechslungsreiche Idee, die neue Möglichkeiten in den Mythos über die menschliche Spinne einbringt. Diesen jugendlichen und aufgeweckten Spider-Man fängt Holland perfekt ein.

Doch er ist nicht der einzige Nerd. Natürlich bekommt Spider-Man einen noch nerdigeren "Sidekick".

Sein bester Freund Ned erfährt durch einen urkomischen Zufall Spider-Mans wahre Identität und will ihm zur Seite stehen, aber nicht bevor er ihn mit unzähligen Fanboy-Fragen durchlöchert.

Schnell erweist sich Ned als unerwartet komischer Szenendieb, der sich glücklicherweise auch in seriöseren Momenten durchsetzen kann.

Rückblickend fragt man sich, warum die anderen Spidey-Filme noch nie einen eingeweihten Sidekick hatten.

Selbst der ikonische Tony Stark kehrt zurück, erstmals allerdings nicht als zentrale Figur. Die Befürchtung, dass er den Film übernimmt, ist ungerechtfertigt, denn er hält sich als Mentor für Spider-Man zurück und beschränkt sich auf ein paar wenige und dennoch wichtige Szenen im Film.

Er lobt, belehrt und tadelt natürlich vor allem letzteres. Das zeigt sich bereits an den schwer zu beeindruckenden Einwohnern, die sich nach einer Alien-Invasion und einem etablierten Heldenteam nicht von einem Typen im Spinnenkostüm beeindrucken lassen.

Und vor allem einer hat darunter zu leiden: Birdman. Denn Birdman kehrt zurück — diesmal als Geier engl.

Michael Keaton, der damals als Batman und kürzlich in Birdman oder Die unverhoffte Macht der Ahnungslosigkeit brillierte, kehrt zurück. Doch dieses Mal als erstaunlich überzeugender Schurke.

Einzig die eingeschmuggelte Alien-Technologie und der so ermöglichte Bau und Verkauf von futuristischen Waffen kann ihn und seine Familie vor dem Ruin bewahren.

Mit dieser Rolle erschafft Keaton einen überzeugenden und sogar sympathischen Schurken, der sogar etwas an Walter White aus Breaking Bad erinnert.

Davor wirkt der Konflikt recht unpersönlich und langatmig. Peter Parker macht deutlich, dass er noch am Anfang seiner Karriere steht.

So fällt auch die erste Hälfte des Filmes relativ locker aus, in der sich Spider-Man tollpatschig als Held beweisen will und sich nur langsam an die echte Gefahr herantastet.

Der Grad an Action bleibt hingegen nur solide. Trotz allem bleibt der Film durchgehend spannend — ironischerweise besonders dann, wenn Parker seinen Anzug nicht trägt.

Spider-Man: Homecoming überzeugt durch eine erfrischende und abwechslungsreiche Interpretation der freundlichen Spinne aus der Nachbarschaft.

Obwohl die Zuschauer etwas auf bombastische und innovative Action verzichten müssen, wird das mit tollen Charakteren, einer aufwändigen Umsetzung und einem überzeugenden Schurken wieder wett gemacht.

Kritik: Spider-Man: Homecoming. Lesedauer: 5 Mins. Wenig Zeit? Movie Info. Thrilled by his experience with the Avengers, young Peter Parker returns home to live with his Aunt May.

Under the watchful eye of mentor Tony Stark, Parker starts to embrace his newfound identity as Spider-Man. He also tries to return to his normal daily routine -- distracted by thoughts of proving himself to be more than just a friendly neighborhood superhero.

Peter must soon put his powers to the test when the evil Vulture emerges to threaten everything that he holds dear.

Jon Watts. Kevin Feige , Amy Pascal. Jonathan M. Jul 10, Columbia Pictures, Marvel Studios. Marvel Cinematic Universe. Michael Keaton Adrian Toomes, Vulture.

Robert Downey Jr. Tony Stark, Iron Man. Marisa Tomei May Parker. Jon Favreau Happy Hogan. Gwyneth Paltrow Pepper Potts. Zendaya Michelle.

Donald Glover Aaron Davis. Jacob Batalon Ned. Laura Harrier Liz. Jon Watts Director. Goldstein Screenwriter. John Francis Daley Screenwriter.

Jon Watts Screenwriter. Christopher Ford Screenwriter. Chris McKenna Screenwriter. Erik Sommers Screenwriter. Kevin Feige Producer.

Amy Pascal Producer. Louis D'Esposito Executive Producer. Who Is the Best Spider-Man? August 17, Full Review…. July 17, Full Review….

July 13, Full Review…. July 10, Full Review…. July 14, Full Review…. July 3, Full Review…. July 1, Rating: A- Full Review….

July 1, Full Review…. View All Critic Reviews Jun 18, A lackluster villain leaves us wanting just a bit more from the film.

Holland is great as a teenage "superhero". Spencer M Super Reviewer. Jun 09, It should be noted that, out of everything that I loved as a child, Spider-Man was one of those.

That's why, when Spider-Man 3 and this is back when Tobey Maguire was still Spider-Man announced that Venom would be what I assumed to be the main villain of the film, the little kid in me was chomping at the bit.

Of course, we all know how Spider-Man 3 turned out. It's the worst of the franchise and, I'm sure, to some people, one of the worst major superhero movies of all time.

To say that Venom was a disappointment is an understatement, given that his appearance was very limited, like as in only left for the 3rd act instead of having him run roughshod as the main villain, forgetting all the nonsense with Sandman and all the other bullshit in that movie.

Regardless, I'd still say that, as a kid, I was a Spider-Man fan. Obviously that fandom has dissipated since I, say, turned But I've always been interested in following the franchise and now that Marvel Studios has reached a deal where they share the film rights to the character with Sony, they can finally introduce him to their larger universe.

And, of course, with Civil War and Infinity War, they did just that. Having said all of that, though, and this might be a controversial statement to some, but I feel that Tom Holland is already the best out of the three actors who have played Spider-Man in films, at least since Tobey Maguire will, probably, always be the most associated with the character and Andrew Garfield, really, probably won't be remembered as well.

I'm not saying that Toby and Andrew did a poor job, far from it. Then again, Tobey had some cringe-worthy scenes in the original trilogy.

As did Andrew Garfield. But the reason I feel that Tom Holland is already the best Spider-Man is for one reason and one reason only.

And that is the fact that he actually feels like a teenager in high-school. Tom is a very young man, he's 22, but he's got a very youthful appearance and his voice definitely helps him.

So, to me, he can believably play a teen. And just the way he acts, with the energetic introductory minutes when he's filming his meeting Tony Stark and then filming the airport battle, it just feels far more authentic than Tobey and Andrew's portrayal.

The issue with those two, to me, is that they were very clearly actors both in their lates by the time of their first appearance as the character pretending to be teens.

Tom's performance, again, feels more authentic and, therefore, more believable. The thing about Tom, also, is that he's clearly very likable and that lends itself to a character like Spider-Man, where he's a meant to be a bit of a scrawny kid.

Scrawny kids everywhere can look at him and relate to him and, maybe, even live vicariously through him. Another positive to me is that the movie isn't an origin story in the slightest.

You don't get to see how he became Spider-Man. He's already been Spider-Man for two months at the film's start. There's no Uncle Ben and how he tragically died.

Maybe some comic book nerds hate that, but it's a story that has already been told twice. For this second reboot, they needed to do something different.

Something that we haven't seen before, from this character at least. The fact that Peter Parker has already been Spider-Man for a couple of months at the start of the film frees up the writers to just get down to the nitty-gritty.

If they had done an origin story, who knows how much time that would have taken up and then to establish a villain that feels like an actual threat, I just feel like there wouldn't be enough time to do all of these things and to do them well.

The simpler, no-frills approach allows them to hit the ground running. I also like the idea that Peter is on this Stark Internship that's, basically, a series of tests to show Tony Stark that Peter is, in fact, ready to join the Avengers and be part of the team.

So, in exchanging the origin story, you still get that part where Peter is still trying to figure out his powers and what exactly to do with them.

The entire movie is a learning process for him. And I like that, it's far more believable than just having a few scenes where Tobey's Spidey, as an example, would just tumble around and fall off buildings while learning the truth strength of his powers.

This, really, is an entire movie of that. And, in my opinion, that allows you to learn more about the character, given that he's still not in full control of his abilities as a result of the fact that he's still just 15 years old.

So, yea, I liked that more grounded approach to the superhero lore. Obviously, there's still the over-the-top action you've come to expect from Spider-Man, where he uses his agility and his web shooters to tie up evildoers up in crazy ways.

Having said that, I commend the movie for, again, taking a more grounded and 'believable' approach to the characters. But there's a couple of issues I have with that.

Look, I have friends who live in New York, but as a setting for a film, particularly one like this, it's really played out. The reason I say this is that the last Marvel movie I saw Thor: Ragnarok took place in a beautifully vibrant and exciting world.

Guardians of the Galaxy takes place in strange planets as well. Doctor Strange has incredibly crazy and surreal visuals.

Who knows where those films go, visually speaking at least. So, with everything that you've seen out of Marvel and the craziness attached to how they approach their world design, just New York City as a setting is, honestly, a little bland.

I'm not saying that NYC, as a whole, is bland, since that city is full of personality and life. But, again, this is in comparison to what I've seen of late from Marvel Studios' own movies.

There are also still the same issues with the villains in the MCU being more like 'villains of the week' instead of being actually memorable characters.

I don't know how Vulture plays out in the comics and if he's one of Spidey's most memorable villains, but the character just does nothing for me here.

I mean, as far as motivations go, he's probably got some of the best. The rich ie: Tony Stark screwed him out of a contract to pick up salvage from the Battle of New York from the original Avengers, I'm assuming, by the Stark corporation.

So, to ge back at Stark, Vulture proceeds to become sort of an advanced weapons dealer using the Chitauri technology that he and his crew already salvaged.

That's all fine and good, but I feel that there's nothing to Vulture as a character, other than him being the father of Peter's crush, Liz.

Michael Keaton is great, as always, but the character definitely needed a lot of work and, from what I understand, he's coming back for the sequel.

And it'll be interesting where they pick things up with him, given how everything ended here between himself and Peter. But, back to the positives, while I wouldn't call the film hilarious, I do like the lighter tone.

It doesn't take itself as seriously as one might have expected and it's to the benefit of this film. Because, in my opinion, this ends up feeling like an 80s teen comedy ala John Hughes mixed in with a superhero flick.

And, honestly, that's not something that I thought I'd ever see. I'll be honest, in spite of all the positives I've mentioned about this flick, I felt that there was something honestly missing.

I never felt that it was anything more than good. Even after Tony took Peter's enhanced suit away and Peter was forced to, really, become his own man so to speak for the first time and take care of matters himself with his own shitty, DIY costume.

I thought that was good character progression, since you got to see Peter mature. But, and I suppose this is what the beginning of every franchise is, but this felt like a glorified starting point for bigger and, hopefully, better things.

This was a way to reintroduce the character into the wider and larger MCU. Of course, they did so in a way where you don't have to have followed the larger arc to enjoy this movie.

But, really, this was just a reintroduction of the character. And, really, it's kinda hard to see that, in my opinion, as a great movie. I don't think this is a great movie nor do I think it was even ever meant to be.

It was meant to be a solid popcorn movie, but it's also very obviously the starting point for bigger things.

I realize that might sound stupid, but, again, I never felt like this was meant to be a great movie. This sets the stage for the sequel where they will, then, pull out all the stops.

I also like the little hints of chemistry between Michelle and Peter, setting up a potential romance in the sequels, given that she's this Spidey's version of Mary Jane.

She goes by the initials of MJ, but she's not Mary Jane. As far as building up a sequel, there's a minor post-credit scene where Vulture seems like he's gonna be gunning for Peter if he gets out.

There's also a hint of a Sinister Six-like team that could also be gunning or Peter in one of the sequels. So they've set the stage, now all that's left is to follow through.

The post-credit scene with Captain America is also pretty funny, given the expectations people now have of Marvel Studios films always having some sort of post-credits scene where something is set-up for the future.

People will sit through minutes and minutes and minutes of insufferable credits only to catch a glimpse of what's coming next.

Well, this post-credits scene pokes fun at that and I liked it. Definitely very meta, but it was pretty funny. While there's a lot that I liked about this movie, there was nothing about it that I loved.

Well, I mean, Tom Holland is pretty great. I'm not saying that there's nothing to see here, since you probably need to see this if you're gonna be invested in the sequels, but I don't feel that there's anything here that's gonna blow anyone away.

Again, it provides an enjoyable and good summer blockbuster. It's nothing more than that. So while I would give it a thumbs up, I can't really give it a glowing recommendation.

I watched this because I had a Starz free trial on Amazon Prime, so if you have that, then give this a shot. If not, then just wait to see if a friend has the DVD and borrow it from then.

I don't feel that there's any reason to actually spend money on this. Still, good enough movie. Looking forward to what the sequels bring to the table.

Jesse O Super Reviewer. Jan 09, Holy spandex we're back with another Spider-Man movie. The Raimi movies came to a grinding halt after a well rounded start, and the Marc Webb movies hehe Webb never really got off the ground.

So Marvel stepped in and secured a deal with Sony to gain back the rights of Spidey, sort of. We were then presented with yet another Spider-Man reboot but this time under the guidance of Marvel along with Columbia, Amy Pascal and Sony.

The plot pretty much does exactly what anyone would expect it to do really. The only difference being this time they have skipped the whole origins part of the tale.

We jump straight into the story with Parker already established as Spider-Man something everyone knows because it follows on from 'Captain America: Civil War'.

But bottom line, Toomes is trying to scavenge Chitauri technology from 'The Avengers' so he can build and sell advanced weapons.

Toomes is essentially an arms dealer and Parker must stop him, the end. So initially we are introduced to Toomes Michael Keaton and his men as they salvage Chituari technology.

They are stopped and ordered to cease their work at once by the Department of Damage Control a partnership of Tony Stark and the US government.

This pisses off Toomes and he asks his men to stay with him so he can build a powerful suit Firstly this entails a large operation which I'm not too sure how Toomes manages to keep under wraps.

Secondly, why would his men stick by his side knowing they are doing illegal shit? OK they need work, but illegal work?

And they help Toomes build his all powerful Vulture suit Surely alarm bells should be ringing with these blue collar guys by now.

From here its back to school with Parker Tom Holland and his amazing bunch of diverse friends. Nothing wrong with that but it always tends to come across as a little too on the nose; a little bit too perfect looking.

Spiderman Homecoming Kritik Bewertung: 1.5 / 5

User folgen 29 Follower Lies die Kritiken. In: Liza Minnelli. Ich habe vielleicht die Erwartungen und die Messlatte etwas zu hoch gesetzt, als ich las und sah wie gut der rüberkam. Marvel Cinematic Universe. Wer soll das glauben? Spider-Man - Homecoming. Wer aber etwas anderes erwartet, der wird vermutlich enttäuscht werden.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 thoughts on “Spiderman Homecoming Kritik

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.